April 2008


Glossolalia HQListening to a putative display of glossolalia (apparently to-order) on the old tube last night, I caught myself smiling. 

The glossolalist in question was making a bit of a pig’s breakfast out of explaining the phenomenon with any degree of clarity.  Apart from my usual thought that it would be much more sporting of the Holy Ghost to inspire these people with the gift of actual, recognisable languages (and, as the Catholic Encyclopædia says: “The charisma of interpretation is [...] the necessary complement of glossolalia; when interpretation is not forthcoming, the speaker with tongues shall hold his peace.”), another thought also flitted through the draughty chasm of my mind.  I know, two at a time: working to capacity.

Isn’t it odd, I mused, that those who appear to be most effortlessly eloquent in these strange tongues are frequently those who are least eloquent in talking about them (or anything else) in tongues which are familiar to the rest of us?  Do these tongue-tied individuals, I wonder, ever reflect with chagrin on the irony of that?

I saw in a banner-ad at the bottom of a website this morning that the M*rmons are advertising themselves under the slogan of “Truth Restored” these days.  I choked on my biscuit. 

Rievaulx "restored"

Truth “restored”.  Uhuh.  Like Henry VIII “restored” the monasteries.  I think I’ll take my Truth fully un-restored, thanks.

Tag, tig, or kissie-catchies?Well, there’s not been a new post here for a wee while, so you’ll just have to be grateful for whatever you get. 

I’ve been tagged.  No, no, no—not for shoplifting or ram-raiding or defacing headstones in pet cemeteries.  Not this time, anyway.  I mean I’ve been sent a meme, a wee questionnaire.  By the next big thing in Canadian literature, Seraphic Single.  No, it’s no use asking me what possible interest any of the answers I’ve provided are, or to whom: just read and be grateful if I haven’t tagged you in turn.  Go on, you might even enjoy yourselves…

1. The rules of the game get posted on the beginning.
2. Each player answers the rules about himself.
3. At the end of the post, the player tags five people and posts their names, then goes to their blogs and leaves them a comment, letting them know that they’ve been tagged and asking them to read his blog.

What I was doing ten years ago:
I was a teaching-monkey (official title: “Lecturer in Social Science”) at an FE college. I taught philosophy (and other random stuff) there part-time, whilst researching for an MLitt. at my alma mater.

Five things on my To-Do list today:
1. Go to work.
2. Discuss some random stuff with the boss (who’s been off for a week).
3. Call the the relevant authority to discuss declaring my car off-road (and therefore tax-exempt).
4. Clear up the house (properly) after Friday night’s dinner party.
5. Read more of that inestimable tome, The Widow of Saint-Pierre.

Things I would do if I were a billionaire:
1. Pay off the bank.
2. Buy and furnish a house.
3. Endow/fund assorted Catholic charities, projects, institutions, etc.
4. Offer help to family and friends.
5. Invest a small amount for personal use and ensure nothing was left after all of the above.

Three of my bad habits:
1. Surfing the net (yeah, like this is gonna help…).
2. General procrastination.
3. Fibbing to barbers/taxi-drivers.

Five places I’ve lived:
1. Dundee, Scotland.
2. W–lb–k (near Dundee).
3. Aberdeen, Scotland.
4. Old Aberdeen, Scotland.
5. Edinburgh (Athens Borealis, innit).

Five jobs I’ve had:
1. Bookshop assistant.
2. Beadle.
3. College lecturer.
4. University tutor.
5. Education/interpretation officer for “heritage” organisation.

Five books I’ve recently read:
1. Mary and the Fathers of the Church (Fr Gambero).
2. The Tragical Tale of Aelianus of England (Seraphic Single).
3. On (Hilaire Belloc).
4. The Red Door (Iain Crichton Smith).
5. The Temple of Death: The Ghost Stories of A.C. and R.H. Benson.

And of course I am reading The Widow of Saint-Pierre.  But who isn’t, right?

Five people or communities I’m going to tag:
In an effort to keep a Catholic and/or Scottish theme going, poor Mark, Cirdan, Catholic Teuchtar, Ebo and Cath are so getting tagged. Sorry, chaps…

 

Yellow WidowTo combine one shameless plug with another, I’m ostensibly posting this to celebrate the publication of the book puffed below

But since I’d already mentioned the widow Clicquot down there, and since the non-vintage bottle is so very attractive and so powerfully evocative of joyous good fun and bonhomie (for me at any rate—you lot can get your own Proustian-madeleine-type-thingie), I thought I’d pop this piccie up.

The thought that some lovely rep from said bubbly-co might drop by and see that I’ve directly linked to their website, and then, perhaps, casually reward my disinterested plug (it really is marvellous stuff, you know: if need be, sell your children to ensure a regular suppy) with a bottle magnum case of this very nectar, never crossed my simple mind.  No, not even once, I tell you.

[After this case, VCP would no doubt be delighted to take this opportunity to foster Canadian goodwill by an act of spontaneous largesse to celebrate the publication!  I for one would drink a toast to such a gesture... ]

The Widow of Saint-Pierre by Seraphic Single (Book) in Science Fiction & FantasyNever has there been such rejoicing over the making of a widow (excepting maybe Mme Clicquot).  I’ve ordered mine—when will you be ordering yours? 

Buy, buy, buy this fabulous new tome, freshly penned by the fair hand of a deserving Canadian gentlewoman keen to rediscover her Caledonian patrimony.

What—you’ve read this far into the post without yet having purchased copies for your self, family, friends and pets?  Rectify that immediately

See?  That feels better, now doesn’t it?  Think how much better still it’ll feel when the wee beauty pops through your wee letterboxes.  Why, it’ll make you want to begin the buying process all over again!

The author of this ‘blog would like to make it quite clear that he is not working on commission for sales of the aforementioned book—it’s just his natural kindness shining through…

Perusing idly (I don’t do “searching energetically”) my blog stats today, I noticed that not a few people were finding their way here via a Google search for “cumbernauld”.  Oh dear, I thought.  Still, never mind—this site must be way down the list of the million-and-then-some sites featuring that fair town.  Said I to myself said I, I’ve probably blown what little chance I had of being presented with the Freedom of the Toon now—I’ll take that one manfully on the chin—but I’m likely enough to remain unmolested by the Loyal Cumbernauldian Crew (”ye bas”). 

But.  It then ocurred to me to check Google images.  A very recent search for “cumbernauld” there brought up a link to my wee post as the… very first result.  That’s the very first result out of 33,400.  *Gulp*. 

In addition to a concern for my own physical welfare (some of those chaps from Lanarkshire Borealis can be a tad rough—and that’s to say nothing of their womenfolk), I suppose I feel a wee bit guilty too.  If it helps at all, I’m happy to explain to anyone who may thereby have stumbled hereupon that the offending poyum in question was nothing but a happenstantial whimsy, a totem more to my desire to see my febrile nonsense in e-print than to any genuine animosity to her or hers.  Let them by all means allow their opinions of said toon to be influenced by less biased and better informed judgements than mine (and they shouldn’t be too hard to find).

In related news, someone found their way here today by googling “hate picasso” (though TT is currently way down on the list for that one).  It takes all sorts.

[Er,  I suppose this post has just made the very problem it raises worse.  Bum.]

McMortar-board“That’s no a haiku!”

“Aye it is!”  “No it’s no!”  “Is!”

“No!”  “Is!”  ”Shut it, youse!”

Conning by my hearth          Pio Nono

The Syllabus Errorum,

“Something understood”.

Christopher Simpson, a younger contemporary of Hume's

Of your charity, spare a prayer for the soul of one Captain Tobias Hume, a supposed Scotsman, a composer and champion of the viol—and sometime snail-eater.  The 363rd anniversary of his death falls one week from today.

I have known and admired his work for some time, having bought a very fine (bargain-price) 2 CD set of his Captaine Humes Poeticall Musicke several years ago.  This week BBC Radio 3’s Composer of the Week feature is music from the Court of James VI & I, and Hume was featured in Monday’s and last night’s episodes.  It appears, from the biog I heard there and have since followed up, that the poor old soldier fell rather on hard times towards the end of his career, and I was particularly struck by this detail in the following petition:

I have not one penny to helpe me at this time to buy me bread, so that I am like to be starved for want of meat and drinke, and did walke into the fields very lately to gather Snailes in the nettles, and brought a bagge of them home to eat, and doe now feed on them for want of other meate.

from The True Petition of Colonel Hume, as it was presented to the Lords assembled in the High Court of Parliament (1642)

Having taken careful note of this last night, I was somewhat taken aback this morning when I walked into the stately camera d’audienza of the Palazzo Ben’Ambrosiano (er, my sitting room) to find fine silver trails elegantly tracing patterns all over the carpet: clearly the work of a snail or slug who had escaped from the bag of logs I had brought in last night.  I immediately sent up a quick petition for the soul of poor, talented, gallant Tobias Hume, and ask you to do the same.

Truth-TrimAmongst the occasions on which I think no chap ought to be considered to be strictly “on oath” (being asked for his opinion when accompanying a lady who is clothes-shopping or who has just redressed herself for the umpteenth time preparatory to a social engagement, for example) I would have to include “when in the barber’s chair”.

Today, I eventually dragged myself to a fairly traditional-looking barber’s shop (picked on the arbitrary grounds that it bore my surname in large letters on its frontage) for a long-overdue shearing.  Now, I don’t know quite why this should be so, but I cannot get myself to relax sufficiently whilst having my locks lopped to forego the occasional fib.  I put it no more strongly that that, but I often find myself incapable of telling the complete truth when accosted (howsoever courteously and gently) with the perfectly reasonable and non-privacy-violating questions put to me in the chair.

Today, I was able to approach the seat of shearing immediately, without first having to feign interest in the assorted laddish reading material in the waiting area (or instead having to face the self-consciousness of being observed extracting the supremely unladdish LRB from the bag I carried with me).  That’s the way (uh-huh, uh-huh) I like it (uh-huh, uh-huh).  The locks-smith who received me was a pleasant, comely young woman who, as she confided to me in the course of the cut, was studying for a degree in social work.  She said little enough, and directed towards me only a moderate number of questions during the ten or so minutes it took for her to complete her task.  And yet.

“Doing anything nice in town today?” she asked.  Now, rather than tell her the boring, spoddish but nonetheless innocuous truth (er, reading my mag in a caff, blogging a bit, patronising the odd second-hand bookshop and catching some nosh and a movie at the local arty-farty cinema) I said: “Oh, probably just watching the football down the pub, and meeting some guys for a drink later on.”  I astonished myself.  The poor girl wasn’t to know this, but I’d just perpetrated an utterly unnecessary fraud against her.  There was not the remotest chance of my doing either of those things because: a) I really don’t watch football at all, let alone on my tod in bars; and b) I hadn’t made, and had no intention of making, any plans to meet anybody at any stage of the day.  But that is somehow what I must have found it most easy to say, perhaps because it must have sounded to me the sort of thing that she would be most comfortable hearing. 

But why?  It’s not as if the truth were in any way shameful: “Oh, I’m off to dismember some kittens and spray-paint obscenities on the National War Memorial.” Nor did I wish to deceive, nor would I get any pleasure or advantage from doing so, and it clearly was not in any way a matter of any consequence one way or another to my barbeuse.  And yet I (rightly, surely) felt a twinge of shame at my casual mendacity.

I was driven to a fresh sortie against strict veracity by her next question: “So what team do you support?”  Nng.  I peddled her some unconvincing twaddle about not supporting either of my home teams but instead supporting the home team of my alma mater–not that I mentioned to my snipstress that the team was that of my old university town, having developed an on-the-spot hesitancy about mentioning I’d even been to university.

I’m confident that, in this case, my fibbing was not a defence against the kind of impertinent and intrusive interrogation one sometimes finds oneself in receipt of from the hands (or rather mouths) of random service-mongers.  There was no such excuse here.  But I suspect myself guilty here of a benign kind of condescension mixed with a mild self-consciousness.  I told her what I though she was ready to hear and comfortable responding to, and thereby saved us both (as I supposed) a bit of potential awkwardness.  Not a Stalinist crime against the commonweal, perhaps.  But an unnecessary fib nonetheless.

Aaaanyway, 700-odd (odd) words about my mild moral discomfort on a short trip to the barbers is more than a severe enough strain on the patience of any potential reader.

While I’m in full confessional mode, though, I might as well cough to the same antipathy to unconditional truth in taxis…

Next Page »